Page 3 of 8
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 1:07 pm
				by Shawn
				Thank You...
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:29 pm
				by Shawn
				
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:30 pm
				by SHEEPMAN!
				You have permission to post my before and after pictures. Flamage is always cool. 

 No hurt feelings if you don't post.  

 
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:35 pm
				by SHEEPMAN!
				People working is always good, like the Boxcar. Keep it up. Above post meant to be PM oops.

 
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:38 pm
				by Shawn
				I'm slow.....Before and after what? Your Frontal Lobotomy? My bottle in Front-o-me?
I really am confused here Jeff...
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:51 pm
				by SHEEPMAN!
				You missed the FLAME part friend.
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:51 pm
				by SHEEPMAN!
				These ones.

 
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:14 am
				by Rob
				At least the BOBCAT is okay!!! 

 
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 6:14 pm
				by Shawn
				2 different perspectives of the same sunset.

 
			 
			
					
				Re: Shawn's photo thread
				Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:17 am
				by CWB
				nice pictures ...
i like the "wild root" picture ... takes me back to "ozzie's barbershop" when i was a wee tyke .
the picture of the burning truck with a 5 gallon water bottle in the foreground is great : "an exercise in futility" . 
around town , there are several "sculptures" like the first one in this thread ... painted fiberglass , ceramic or metal .
there is one that was/is quite controversial ...
http://www.citypages.com/news/gaea-the- ... lk-6565695 
follow this link "City Manager John Chattin took action and censored her beaver from public view." for further information .
( i firmly believe that is a bit tounge-in-cheek)
personally ... i believe that such an *artistic interpretation/endeavor" would be ok in a gallery , but not out in the public purview .